After a talk this week at Harvard, I got kind of stuck in a few thoughts and I thought I'd write a rough note on the topology of conserved currents. Here the topological feature is tied to the existence of a closed differential form which describes the conserved current, its conservation being equivalent to the statement of closedness. It does not mean that the associated differential form is an integral cohomology class (it can be, but not necessarily). This mathematical concept is deeply tied to conservation laws in a way which can be made explicit.
Suppose we have a continuity equation of the form
∇μjμ=∂ρ∂t+∇∂∂xiji=0
on a (n+1)-manifold R×M and set Mt={t}×M. We use greek indices to denote coordinates xμ, μ=0,…,n, on R×M with x0=t, also understood to be the time variable, and xi denote local coordinates on M. Take a Riemannian metric of the form dt2+gt, where gt is a metric in M. Above, ρ is a scalar on R×M and ji∂∂xi is a t dependent vector field on M. ∇ is the Levi-Civita connection. We can define a currrent n-form
J=1n!jμεμν1…νn√gdxν1∧⋯∧dxνn
Observe then that
dJ=∇μjμ√gdx0∧⋯∧dxn=0
In other words, conservation of jμ is equivalent to J being closed. J being closed means that ∫MtJ is constant. This is a consequence of Stokes' theorem. To see this take the manifold with boundary M×[0,t]. Then
∫M×[0,t]dJ=0=∫M×{t}J−∫M×{0}J
and hence the charge Q(Ms)=∫MsJ with s=0,t satisfies
Q(M0)=∫M0ρ√gdx1∧⋯∧dxn=∫Mtρ√gdx1∧⋯∧dxn=Q(Mt),
i.e., it is time independent.
Comments
Post a Comment